Allahabad High Court enraged the husband’s ‘dirty’ action, said – if the marriage is of marriage, the wife’s ‘owner’ has not become … Know the whole matter – Allahabad High Court Strint on Husband Who Made Wife WIFE PRIVATE VIVATE VIVATE VIDE VIDEO VIRAL Refuse to Cancel Criminal Casel Case Loclam

The Allahabad High Court has refused to cancel a criminal case against a person accused of uploading an intimate video of itself and his wife on Facebook. The court said that marriage does not give a husband ownership or control over his wife, nor weakens his autonomy or right to privacy.

According to the news agency, dismissing an application filed to cancel the charge sheet, Justice Vinod Diwakar said, “By uploading an intimate video on Facebook, the applicant (husband) has severely disturbed the sanctity of the marital relationship. A husband is expected to respect the faith, faith and trust by his wife, especially in the context of their intimate relations.

The High Court said, “Sharing such a video is a violation of privacy. It is also a violation of mutual belief, which weakens the foundation of marital relations. Honoring the wife’s physical autonomy and privacy is not only a legal obligation, but also a moral imperative to promote a true equal relationship.”

Let us tell you that his wife had filed a case against Pradyuman Yadav under Section 67 of the IT Act in Mirzapur district, alleging that Pradyuman made a pornographic video of the intimate act between him from his mobile without his information and consent, which first uploaded on Facebook and then shared with his wife’s cousin and others.

The lawyer in the case said that the applicant is a legally married husband of the complainant and therefore, as an applicant, no offense is formed under Section 67 of the IT Act. There is a lot of possibility of agreement between husband and wife.

However, the Additional Government Advocate opposed the argument on the basis that even though the complainant is the legally married wife of the applicant, the applicant has no right to make pornographic videos of her and to broadcast her to cousins ​​and other co-villagers.