Salar Ghazi Akrana or Saint? Know how the new controversy started with the statement of Sambhal Police – Salar Ghazi An Invader or a Saint Sambhal Police Statement Starts A New Controversy in Up NTC

A new character of the controversy in Sambhal has been revealed. The question arises that who was the Ghazi Ghazi? Was he an invader or a saint? If there was an invader, then why the fair has been held in his memory for years and if he was a saint, then why is his name taken in the robbery of Somnath temple? Sambhal police has refused to organize a fair in his name this time.

Sambhal’s ASP Srischandra’s statement is becoming very viral. In this, he tells some people of the Muslim class, “History is witness that he (Salar Ghazi) was the commander of Ghaznavi. He had looted Somnath. The slaughter was done in the whole country. The program would not be held in the memory of any robber. If someone tries to do this illegal work then there will be strict action. The person who has done this with the country will be a traitor.”

After this statement of the Edictive SP, Sambhal is once again in the headlines. The reason for the controversy is Salar Ghazi, in whose name the police have clearly refused to organize the fair of ‘Ghazi Mian’. In this way, after Aurangzeb, now the new name has entered the politics and that is Syed Salar Masood Ghazi.

Ghazi’s Dargah in Bahraich

Syed Salar Masood Ghazi’s Dargah is in Bahraich district of UP. A big fair has been held here for hundreds of years. Apart from Bahraich, Ghazi Mian’s fair has been held in many districts of UP, but this time the police stopped the fair organizers from doing so. On Tuesday, a large number of police forces were deployed at the place where the fair was to be organized.

Now the question is, who was Syed Salar Masood Ghazi? Was he a saint or a robber? If he was a robber, then why was the fair being organized in his memory for so many years? The police of Sambhal believe that Salar Ghazi was an invader, a fair should not be held in his name. But those who hold the fair have started preparing to take this matter to court. But the question is the same who was Salar Ghazi. What do historians say about him?

The Syed Salar Masood Ghazi, which has spread a dispute, was born in the 11th century in Ajmer in the year 1014. It is believed that he came to the areas of Awadh around 1030-31, where King Suheldev fought with 21 kings and demolished Syed Salar Masood Ghazi in the year 1034.

How did Ghazi’s tomb become?

Now the question is that if Syed Salar Masood Ghazi was not a saint, then how did the tomb become in his talk? After he died, his tomb was created in Bahraich and he started praying in many districts. The Dargah Sharif of Bahraich was buried while he was also accused of robbing the Somnath temple in ⁠gujarat. But many people do not consider Ghazi connecting Ghazi with the attack on the Somnath temple. Because, Ghazi was 11 years old at the time of attack on Somnath temple. It is also claimed that his presence is not mentioned during the attack in history. In such a situation, we see the decision of Sambhal Administration with the opponent BJP politics.

The view of seeing Salar Ghazi is different. The important question related to which is that if he was not a saint, then who changed his image. It is believed that 200 years later in 1250, the tomb was built on the tomb of Syed Salar Masood Ghazi, then this work was done by Naseeruddin Mahmud, the Mughal ruler of Delhi. After this, many Mughal rulers called Masood Ghazi a saint. Feroz Shah Tughlaq made several domes near the tomb. After this, a fair continued to be organized here in memory of Ghazi.

His dargah became holy like a saint, but after the Neja fair in memory of Masood Ghazi in Sambhal, the number of zerines at the dargah has also reduced. But one of the big questions is that Syed Salar Masood Ghazi is accused of robbing and breaking the Somnath temple, why do Hindus go to his dargah in large numbers?